Posts Tagged ‘ economy

New Berlin Mayor’s Characterization of Citizens as Bigots Should Have Been Snobs

It’s too bad. There are so many closed-minded people. In New Berlin, WI, plans for a low-income housing unit have been underway. When this was announced to residents, they sent the mayor emails asking him to reconsider for various reasons, including an increase in crime, an increase in property taxes, and home/property devaluation. For an overview of this controversy (including a copy of the offending email), please visit this story at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s website. These may be sincere, valid concerns. But they also may be thinly veiled racism, since minorities are disproportionately represented in low-income communities.

New Berlin is an upper middle class suburb where the population is 95% white (see http://www.neighborhoodlink.com/zip/53151 for the demographic information). In addition, the average home value is $164,200 and the average annual household income is $79,346. The emails sent to the mayor discuss how the people who live in New Berlin chose to do so because they wanted to be in a nice neighborhood away from crime and with “quality people”.

I can, in a way, understand these concerns. Nobody wants to hear gunshots and sirens all the time. And people want to believe that their homes and children are safe. Unfortunately, those kind of beliefs are often based on assumptions and the safety itself is just an illusion. Think of all the news stories about suburban kids using and selling recreational drugs (often the sum of excess free time and excess disposable income – the reasons the parents live in the ‘burbs to begin with) and how the parents always seem so surprised.

Let’s look at this another way. Let’s say you live in New Berlin (or a place like it) and have a teenager who has worked at a local retail store or fast food restaurant (common teen jobs) and is graduating from High School. Maybe your kid goes away to college and decides s/he wants to come back home to work and create a life. In general, entry-level jobs do not support living in this kind of a suburb – much less the kinds of entry level jobs recent college graduates are getting in this economy. So maybe your kid gets a job in town, but has to live 15-20 miles away, where housing is actually affordable and s/he can get a roommate. Then this person has to pay more in gas every day for a commute which could be unnecessary but for a community’s desire to maintain an image. This person has to pay a higher sales-tax rate (because in Milwaukee County, the sales tax is 5.6% versus the 5.1% in New Berlin), provided s/he shops near home. This person has to travel further to see family and enjoy many things in the hometown community. Wouldn’t you, as the parent, want your kid to be able to afford to live nearby? Wouldn’t you want your kids friends (even the ones who decided college wasn’t the way to go) to be able to stick around? What if your kid chose a worthwhile line of work with low pay (working for a non-profit or religious institution – or just teaching!)? Would you want these people to be included in your community or eliminated because the city is trying to maintain an image? Or would you want your community to consistently be infused with new people trying desperately to escape the city? Can it even be called a community if your children are economically forced out as young adults?

I think that dismissing an project that could really help enrich the community through racial, economic, and educational diversity is a mistake that no community can afford to make. The people that wrote the emails linked to above were acting in a selfishly snobby way. Racist? Maybe. But selfish and snobby? Definitely. That’s what the mayor should have called them out for. And the plan should go forward – at least until someone can come up with a valid, unselfish and un-snobby reason it shouldn’t.

Bacteria, Oil, Viruses, Crackpots, and the Great America

Can spending time outdoors make you a calmer, smarter person? What about classrooms – should they include time outside? According to this article on Science Daily’s website, yes. They say that there’s a bacteria that there is a bacteria commonly found in soil that people often breathe in or ingest, and that when this bacteria was tested on lab rats, it produced rats that were able to act faster than others and show fewer signs of anxiety. Who knew?

Anyone out there who was a bit older than I am might remember an oil spill in 1979. Here Rachel Maddow compares that spill with our current situation. I can’t help but wonder why we haven’t learned or developed more effective ways of dealing with these problems.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Now this is just creepy. A man has demonstrated human infection by a computer virus. While this may sound sci-fi to many of us, there are plenty of scientists devoted to studying the future and future technology. A quick skim of a book by one of the field’s most visible authors, Ray Kurzweil, will familiarize anyone with some more ideas that send chills up spines similarly.

Crackpots? You be the judge. I can understand predicting more economic troubles for America this year – it’s not like people are spending less and saving more on a wide scale. But these claims, including the collapse of the FDIC and martial law, sound incredibly far-fetched. I, personally, will believe it when I see it.

With Memorial Day behind us now, we might be ready to read about something other than our veterans and their contributions to our present state of being. I urge you, however, to read this article, written by a veteran, about what it means to be American and what our veterans fought to secure. It’s more the acknowledgment that we’re all human and we all deserve the same rights, but we seem to keep trying to deny rights to others. I’m guessing it’s all about power. When a group of people has more rights (or freedom) than another, it has a greater amount of power than the smaller group – maybe even power over that group. These things are not what America was meant to be.

Round-Up

Instead of constantly posting links to articles, videos, and general nonsense I find on the web to Facebook, I thought I would start creating blog posts with links to all the things I find interesting.  Since my Facebook account already pulls in my blog posts and puts them on my Notes page, I will still be sharing on that site.  I’ll just be expanding the sharing to the entire web with this.

Here goes!

Read Economics is Not a Natural Science by Douglas Rushkoff for an interesting take on economics, the history of economies, and why we might just need to rethink everything.  I can say I learned a lot.

A Brave New (Non-Private) World explores some  media that addresses our society and its evolution regarding privacy issues.

I don’t care what the circumstances are, no one in America should have to cook and WASH with bottled water because the tap water is so polluted.  See this NYT article for more information.

I loved watching the shows on tv (The Science Channel?) about synaesthesia.  A BBC article reports on current research and new findings.

For people looking to acquire local food, one new option is VeggieTrader.  Though most of its current listings are focused on the west coast, I could find several locations within 100 miles of my house.  While that may not sound too local, it’s much better than the distance most of our food travels before reaching our plates.  But to improve the number of offerings everywhere, we should all join and list whatever we can!

For a resource that’s a little closer to home for my fellow Milwaukeeans, see this page at the Urban Ecology Center’s website.  And there’s always Growing Power.

And while we’re on the topic of food, please read Dan Barber’s article in The Nation about the importance of cooking and diversifying our diets.

I think that does it for today.  Thoughts, ideas, and comments are always welcome.  If you’re viewing this anywhere other than through my blog, you should visit the original post here: http://www.jen.jllocke.com/blog/2009/09/15/round-up/ to see all the links correctly.

Please Help Me Understand!!!

I’m interested in understanding different viewpoints on our country’s issues.  I’m confused about the economy and what’s happened over the last 6-9 months.

Last year, under the leadership of GW Bush, our country passed some bailout of about $750 million dollars that went to major banks and businesses that were in trouble.  We’re giving help to and rewarding these corporations for their bad business decisions.  We’re encouraging them to continue to act irresponsibly because there are no consequences.  Many of these companies then gave their executives large bonuses, took extravagant trips, or otherwise publicly wasted money.

Then there was the automotive bailout, which was completely useless.  The auto companies in Detroit have been resisting change for far too long, with the intent of being profitable in the short-term.  Now change has forced itself on the industry and the companies can’t keep up and can’t make a profit – except, it seems, for Ford.  But we’ll see how long their good fortune lasts.

And now we’ve got this stimulus package which I have been neglecting to learn about because of my disillusionment with these other government money-giveaways.  As far as I understand it, this money is going to be pumped into state governments, infrastructure projects, job creation, etc.  One thing I’ve heard a little about lately is a program to help homeowners keep their homes.  And I hear plenty of people complaining about how the people who aren’t paying their bills will be rewarded for that bad behavior and that the responsible, hard-working people won’t get anything, not even a slap on the back and an “atta boy”.  I understand that feeling – to an extent.

There are two elements of that sentiment that completely boggle me, though.  So please help me understand.  Why is it okay to give money away to corporations that act irresponsibly with their money and with the environment and everything else they touch, but it’s not okay to give some money to the little guy who’s suffering exponentially in comparison to the big corporations?  We’re losing 600,000 jobs a month here, folks.  How did throwing money at the corporations save that many jobs per month?

The other part that’s tough for me to understand is about the general animosity toward other human beings.  There may be a small percentage of people that are taking advantage of the system and going to profit from this stimulus package.  But the majority of people that this will benefit are not unlike you or me.  I believe they probably made the best decision they could when they purchased their homes.  They could probably afford to pay their mortgages.  They probably had money saved up in case of emergencies.  Then they hit hard times.  Pay rates remained stagnant, while prices went up everywhere on everything, from gas to groceries to health care.  And health care benefits got worse while other benefits got cut, year after year, at nearly every company.  People were losing jobs and losing stability, though they had been counting on their stability to remain.  Meanwhile, these people are being forced out of their homes that, before all the fit hit the shan, they could afford and enjoy.  These foreclosed homes, coupled with the other homes up for sale in the neighborhood that haven’t sold for many months, are driving the home values down for everyone.  And no one’s buying anything.  People who formerly had high-paying, white-collar positions are left walking the streets at night with nothing but their families and the clothes on their backs.  Please tell me why it’s so evil to give money to these people, when it will have such a dramatic effect on their lives?  When it will have a positive effect on the rest of America’s lives?  And when we did the same thing for corporations that will just throw it all away?  Why in the world is this bad?  Do we really want to have mansions and Hoovervilles (Bushvilles) be the only two options in America?

Look, I was against the financial industry giveaway and the auto industry giveaway because it’s been shown that trickle-down Reaganomics doesn’t work.  It makes the rich richer and the poor stagnant, at best.  It makes the gap between CEO pay and laborer pay increase by incredible margins.  While I am sadly uninformed about this new stimulus package, I can’t understand how it could be worse than the bailout bonanza of the last few months.  At least, it seems to me, we’re finally targeting the people that need real help and have the most power to positively impact the economy – the American citizen.  And while I know that, legally, corporations were granted personhood long ago, I wish being an actual citizen (with voting power) carried more clout than money-hungry soul-eating corporations.  Or should we just start letting them vote, too?